Dave Brown

Bechdel's Rule

There is a meme that has been propagating around the Internet, that has been dubbed “Bechdel’s Rule”, even though Alison Bechdel was only passing on her friend’s suggest. It says that a worthwhile story is one that has two women talking amongst each other for a significant conversation, about something other than a man.

This is a pretty easy rule to satisfy.

I propose a straight-guy corollary to Bechdel’s Rule. In my world, a story is also worthwhile if it has:

(a) a man and a woman of similar circumstances, who

(b) engage in an extended, plot-advancing conversation, and

(c) do not end up in bed together.

I’m just getting a little burned out on the number of men and women in the stories I read who get to talking and this (apparently, obviously) leads directly to romance. Men and women are just as capable of seeing each other as equals and (shockingly-enough) friends in the real world. Why shouldn’t this also show up in fiction?

Comments

Why shouldn’t this also show up in fiction?

Because I read fiction to escape from the realities of my life.

I would extend © to not having any kind of romantic entanglement. “Oh look, a female character: which of the major (male) characters gets into some kind of conflict involving sexual interest?” is a reinforcement of patriarchy and heteronormativity that I find wearying.

Comments?

    (Note: I will never tell anyone your email address, and I'll never spam you. I use your URL only to link back to you, and only if you provide one.)

Back
dagbrown@lart.ca