grumble
I was hoping for significantly-better upstream bandwidth than that.
Comments
Which seems odd; I’m on a 25/15 plan…. huh. Can’t complain.
By sweh at Wed Mar 03 00:36:13 +0900 2010
Yeah, I’m supposed to be on a 100/100 plan. 23.74 is significantly less than 100 (although 92.37 is close enough for me).
By dagbrown at Wed Mar 03 00:36:14 +0900 2010
J:Com and their 100Mbps. This is over ethernet cable, too. Not wireless
By seishinbyou at Wed Mar 03 00:36:14 +0900 2010
I have a large divisor for that if you want it ;-)
By aredridel at Wed Mar 03 00:36:14 +0900 2010
My machine is old and has other bottlenecks that would make that that much bandwidth rather pointless. Besides, I can already fill up my hard drive in ten days if I wanted to with more media than I’d be able to digest in a month, so I don’t need to be able to do that in only one.
By bwross at Wed Mar 03 00:36:14 +0900 2010
Comments?
Backdagbrown@lart.ca
Hate.